FLUKE
Kimball Electronics
Tolomatic
Industrial Scientific
AHEAD
roboception
FLUKE
Kimball Electronics
Tolomatic
Industrial Scientific
AHEAD
roboception
By Swetha Sankar | Tue Jul 1 2025 | 2 min read

When the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) officially replaced the In Vitro Diagnostic Directive 98/79/EC (IVDD) on May 26, 2022, it marked a fundamental shift, not just a regulatory upgrade. IVDR introduces stricter controls, deeper oversight, and expanded responsibilities across the IVD supply chain.

Let’s break down what’s changed and how it impacts your IVD compliance strategy.

IVDR Is a Regulation — Not a Directive

The IVDD was a directive—each EU country could interpret and transpose it into national law. The IVDR, by contrast, is a regulation. That means it’s directly applicable across all EU Member States, eliminating loopholes and inconsistencies.

> Impact: Uniform rules across the EU. No more fragmented compliance frameworks.

Device Classification: From List-Based to Risk-Based

IVDD Classification:

  • Mostly self-certified
  • Few high-risk devices require Notified Body oversight
  • Classification was largely list-based (Annex II & self-test devices)

IVDR Classification (Annex VIII): Now, IVDs are classified by risk to patient and public health:

  • Class A: Low individual/public risk (e.g., lab instruments)
  • Class B: Moderate risk (e.g., pregnancy tests)
  • Class C: High risk (e.g., cancer diagnostics)
  • Class D: Highest risk (e.g., HIV, blood grouping tests)

> Impact: Under IVDR, up to 85% of IVDs now require Notified Body involvement, compared to 15% under IVDD.

Performance Evaluation Requirements

Under IVDD: Limited clinical evidence requirements for many devices.

Under IVDR: Mandatory performance evaluation for every IVD:

  1. Scientific Validity
  2. Analytical Performance
  3. Clinical Performance

All must be documented in a Performance Evaluation Report (PER), updated throughout the lifecycle.

> Impact: Significant increase in data generation, documentation, and ongoing updates—even for legacy products.

General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR)

IVDD → Essential Requirements (Annex I) IVDR → General Safety and Performance Requirements (Annex I)

Expanded and more specific requirements under IVDR include:

  • Chemical, biological, and physical properties
  • Infection and contamination control
  • Measurement accuracy
  • UDI traceability
  • Labeling clarity in all EU languages
  • Risk control and lifecycle management

> Impact: More documentation. Broader supplier traceability. New design, testing, and validation checkpoints.

Conformity Assessment: New Routes and Oversight

Under IVDD:

  • Most manufacturers could self-certify (Annex III)
  • Few needed Notified Body review

Under IVDR: Conformity assessment depends on classification and includes:

  • Notified Body audit of Quality Management System (QMS)
  • Product sampling for Class C/D
  • Performance Evaluation File (PEF) and PER review
  • Use of EU certificates of conformity

> Impact: Drastic reduction in self-certification. Complex, audit-ready documentation required for most devices.

Unique Device Identification (UDI) and EUDAMED

Not covered under IVDD.

Under IVDR:

  • Devices require a UDI to ensure traceability
  • Manufacturers, Authorized Reps, Importers must register in EUDAMED
  • Devices must be registered in EUDAMED with UDI-DI and basic UDI-DI elements

> Impact: Mandatory digital traceability for all IVDs across the EU market.

Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) & Vigilance

IVDD: Focused on reactive reporting.

IVDR: Requires a proactive PMS plan, including:

  • PMS reporting procedures
  • Trend reporting
  • Vigilance reporting (15-day deadline for serious incidents)
  • Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) for Class C & D devices
  • Post-Market Performance Follow-up (PMPF) as a continuous process

> Impact: Constant lifecycle monitoring is now legally required—not optional.

New Economic Operator Responsibilities

Under IVDD, obligations were mostly on the manufacturer.

Under IVDR, four economic operators are clearly defined:

  1. Manufacturer
  2. Authorized Representative
  3. Importer
  4. Distributor

Each must verify compliance, maintain documentation, and report incidents.

> Impact: Compliance is now a shared responsibility—and your supply chain is under scrutiny.

Transitional Provisions & Timelines

The EU has staggered IVDR implementation deadlines for legacy devices:

  • Class D: May 26, 2025
  • Class C: May 26, 2026
  • Class B & Class A (sterile): May 26, 2027

Only applicable if:

  • Devices were placed under IVDD with valid certificates
  • No significant design or intended use changes
  • Devices continue to meet IVDD and IVDR PMS/vigilance obligations

> Impact: Manufacturers must work backward from deadlines and prepare new technical documentation now.

Summary: IVDR vs IVDD

Summary IVDR vs IVDD.PNG

How Acquis Simplifies Your IVDR Transition

IVDR isn’t just paperwork—it’s a supply chain transformation. Acquis helps you stay ahead with:

  • Automated GSPR & PER workflows
  • UDI/EUDAMED integration
  • Notified Body audit readiness
  • Supplier declaration traceability
  • Real-time PMS & vigilance tools Request a free IVDR compliance review to find out how ready your IVD operations really are.

Topics

Speak to Our Compliance Experts

Questions about compliance, partnerships, or support? We're here to help.

Share

IVDR vs IVDD: What Changed and What It Means for IVD Manufacturers

IVDD (Directive 98/79/EC) was a Europe-wide directive from 1998 regulating in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs) via national law. In contrast, IVDR (Regulation 2017/746) is a directly applicable EU regulation that replaced IVDD in May 2022, introducing stricter oversight, enhanced transparency, and tighter compliance requirements across all member states
IVDD relied on fixed Annex lists associating diagnostic functions with classes. IVDR enforces a risk-based classification into Classes A–D, using seven rules based on patient and public health risk. Notably, nearly 80–90% of IVDs now require Notified Body review , whereas only ~20% did under IVDD
Under IVDD, most IVDs were self-certified by manufacturers. Under IVDR, only non-sterile Class A devices may still use self-declaration. All other IVDs require Notified Body conformity assessment and CE-marking, significantly raising documentation and oversight levels
IVDR mandates comprehensive performance evaluation—covering scientific validity, analytical performance, and clinical performance—for all risk classes, with lifecycle updates and PMPF included. In contrast, IVDD lacked structured requirements for clinical evidence or real-world performance monitoring
IVDR requires robust PMS and post‑market performance follow‑up (PMPF) plans and documentation as part of Annex III. IVDD largely omitted lifecycle obligations, making IVDR significantly stronger in ongoing safety monitoring and data collection
IVDR mandates that all manufacturers maintain an ISO 13485-compliant QMS, regardless of device class. Unique Device Identification (UDI) is now required, and every organization must appoint a Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC). These were absent or optional under IVDD
Key hurdles include: Conducting gap analyses and updating technical documentation, Establishing clinical performance evidence for legacy devices, Engaging Notified Bodies amid constrained capacity, Implementing UDI systems and EUDAMED registrations, Ensuring PMS/PMPF and QMS compliance. These areas were minimally regulated under IVDD but are central to IVDR readiness