FLUKE
Kimball Electronics
Tolomatic
Industrial Scientific
AHEAD
roboception
FLUKE
Kimball Electronics
Tolomatic
Industrial Scientific
AHEAD
roboception
By Deepa Shetty | Tue Jul 16 2024 | 2 min read

Table of Contents

Rhode Island is considering joining the growing group of U.S. states that restrict intentionally added PFAS in consumer products — but it has not yet enacted a comprehensive consumer PFAS ban.

Rhode Island House Bill 7356 is a proposed bill that would phase out PFAS in specified consumer products if enacted. Much of the confusion around Rhode Island PFAS regulation comes from treating this proposal as if it were already law.

It is not.

This page explains what H7356 proposes, what product categories are in scope, and what is not enforceable today.

What Is Rhode Island H7356?

H7356 is a proposed consumer-product PFAS restriction bill introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly.

If enacted, the bill would:

  • prohibit the manufacture, sale, and distribution of covered products containing intentionally added PFAS,
  • establish phased effective dates for different product categories,
  • require manufacturer certifications and notifications,
  • and authorize enforcement by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM).

As of now, H7356 has not been enacted, and none of its compliance obligations are in force.

Proposed Product Categories Covered by H7356

The bill defines a set of “covered products”, which include:

  • artificial turf
  • carpets and rugs
  • cookware
  • cosmetic products
  • fabric treatments
  • juvenile products
  • menstrual products
  • ski wax
  • textile articles (including apparel)

These definitions are proposed statutory language, not current regulatory requirements.

How H7356 Defines “Intentionally Added PFAS”

Under the bill, PFAS are considered “intentionally added” when:

  • they are deliberately introduced during manufacturing to achieve a specific function or characteristic, or
  • they result from the intentional addition of another chemical that degrades into PFAS.

This definition mirrors language used in other state PFAS proposals and is meant to distinguish functional use from trace contamination.

Proposed Prohibitions and Timelines (If Enacted)

H7356 outlines a phased prohibition structure, which would apply only if the bill becomes law.

General Consumer Product Ban (Proposed)

  • January 1, 2027 Manufacture, sale, and distribution of covered products containing intentionally added PFAS would be prohibited.

Additional Product-Specific Provisions (Proposed)

  • January 1, 2029
    • Artificial turf containing intentionally added PFAS would be prohibited.
    • Outdoor apparel for severe wet conditions could remain on the market only if labeled “Made with PFAS chemicals.”

These dates are proposed, not binding.

Manufacturer Obligations (Proposed)

If enacted, H7356 would require manufacturers to:

  • certify compliance for covered products,
  • notify retailers when products are prohibited from sale,
  • and provide certificates of compliance upon request by DEM.

These obligations do not apply today.

Enforcement and Penalties (Proposed)

The bill proposes civil penalties of:

  • up to $1,000 for a first violation, and
  • up to $5,000 for subsequent violations.

Enforcement authority would rest with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, but only after enactment.

Important Clarification: Firefighting Foam

H7356 is often incorrectly described as a firefighting foam ban.

It is not.

Rhode Island already regulates PFAS in firefighting foam under separate, earlier legislation. H7356 focuses on consumer products, not emergency-response foams.

Blending these regimes leads to compliance errors.

Exemptions in the Proposed Bill

H7356 includes proposed exemptions for:

  • unavoidable trace quantities of PFAS in cosmetics (e.g., impurities or packaging migration),
  • used or second-hand products.

These exemptions would only apply if the bill is enacted.

What Is Enforceable in Rhode Island Today

As of now:

  • Rhode Island does regulate PFAS in firefighting foam under existing law.
  • Rhode Island does not have a comprehensive consumer PFAS product ban.
  • H7356 represents policy direction, not current compliance obligation.

What H7356 Signals for Manufacturers

Even though H7356 is not law, it signals that:

  • Rhode Island is aligning with states like Maine, Connecticut, and Minnesota on consumer PFAS policy,
  • future PFAS regulation is likely to be product-category-specific,
  • manufacturers without material-level PFAS visibility will struggle to respond quickly if enacted.

Final Takeaway

Rhode Island H7356 is a proposed consumer PFAS ban, not enacted law.

It does not currently prohibit PFAS in consumer products, impose certification duties, or trigger compliance deadlines. But it clearly signals the direction of travel.

Companies that treat H7356 as irrelevant will be reactive. Companies that prepare now will adapt with minimal disruption if the bill advances.

Topics

PFASUSA Regulations

Speak to Our Compliance Experts

Questions about compliance, partnerships, or support? We're here to help.

Share

Rhode Island's Consumer PFAS Ban Act of 2024 (RI H7356)

No. As of now, Rhode Island does not have a comprehensive ban on PFAS in consumer products. House Bill H7356 is a proposed bill, not enacted law. This means there are no active prohibitions, certifications, or reporting obligations for consumer products containing PFAS under H7356 today. Treating the proposal as enforceable law is a common compliance mistake.
H7356 proposes a phased restriction on consumer products that contain intentionally added PFAS. If enacted, it would prohibit the manufacture, sale, and distribution of specific product categories, introduce manufacturer certification requirements, and authorize enforcement by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. None of these provisions apply unless the bill is formally passed.
If enacted, H7356 would apply to defined “covered products,” including carpets and rugs, cookware, cosmetics, juvenile products, menstrual products, textile articles (including apparel), fabric treatments, ski wax, and artificial turf. These categories mirror approaches taken in other U.S. states and signal where future enforcement pressure may concentrate, but they are not regulated today in Rhode Island under this bill.
Under the proposed language, PFAS are considered intentionally added when they are deliberately used to achieve a functional purpose (such as stain resistance or water repellency), or when another chemical is intentionally added that breaks down into PFAS. This definition is designed to separate functional use from incidental trace contamination, a distinction manufacturers must understand if the bill advances.
H7356 proposes a general prohibition starting January 1, 2027 for covered consumer products, with additional provisions beginning January 1, 2029 for artificial turf and certain outdoor apparel. These dates are not binding today. No countdown, transition planning, or enforcement clock has legally started in Rhode Island under this proposal.
No. This is a frequent point of confusion. Firefighting foam containing PFAS is already regulated in Rhode Island under separate, earlier legislation. H7356 focuses on consumer products, not emergency-response foams. Mixing these two regulatory regimes can lead to incorrect compliance decisions.
Manufacturers do not need to certify products, notify retailers, or remove PFAS-containing consumer products from the Rhode Island market today. However, H7356 signals policy alignment with states like Maine, Minnesota, and Connecticut. Companies with material-level PFAS visibility and supplier data readiness will be able to adapt quickly if the bill advances, while others may face rushed reformulation and market disruption.